<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Switch to Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution</link>
	<description>Personal site of a tech enthusiast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:44:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peng Hardin</title>
		<link>http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution/comment-page-1#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>Peng Hardin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qense.nl/?p=113#comment-242</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post. After moving to Evolution I&#039;m finally able to read all of my RSS feeds without switching between the feed reader and my web browser (unless the post includes Flash, of course). I&#039;m still fighting with &lt;a href=&quot;http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5173256&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;syncing my PDA with Evolution&lt;/a&gt;, but there&#039;s one thing I miss from Thunderbird: The ability to see just the folders with unread messages. Have you found a way to do this? I know there&#039;s a way to search and get unread messages but I really liked seeing the folders, not just the messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. After moving to Evolution I&#8217;m finally able to read all of my RSS feeds without switching between the feed reader and my web browser (unless the post includes Flash, of course). I&#8217;m still fighting with <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5173256" rel="nofollow">syncing my PDA with Evolution</a>, but there&#8217;s one thing I miss from Thunderbird: The ability to see just the folders with unread messages. Have you found a way to do this? I know there&#8217;s a way to search and get unread messages but I really liked seeing the folders, not just the messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There&#8217;s got to be an easier way &#171; I&#8217;m Just an Avatar</title>
		<link>http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution/comment-page-1#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>There&#8217;s got to be an easier way &#171; I&#8217;m Just an Avatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qense.nl/?p=113#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] by Peng on 11 June 2008  After reading Sense Hofstede&#8217;s post about moving from Thunderbird to Evolution and finally being able to sync all the info to his PDA I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Peng on 11 June 2008  After reading Sense Hofstede&#8217;s post about moving from Thunderbird to Evolution and finally being able to sync all the info to his PDA I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpoa</title>
		<link>http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution/comment-page-1#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>jpoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qense.nl/?p=113#comment-224</guid>
		<description>My God... What have you done? :)
Tried it once. So slow, terrible spam filters, and slow.
Oh, and it is also slow.

But hey, best of lucks pal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My God&#8230; What have you done? <img src='http://www.sehofstede.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Tried it once. So slow, terrible spam filters, and slow.<br />
Oh, and it is also slow.</p>
<p>But hey, best of lucks pal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirrus</title>
		<link>http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution/comment-page-1#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qense.nl/?p=113#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Heh... Not really a hack or feature. But I just un-installed Evolution from my box... I&#039;ve found it to be useless in the long run. 

Its just too buggy! The number of crashes, problems, corruptions, deaths, panics and general horriblenesses its caused made me give up. I&#039;ve just switched back to Thunderbird. ;)

Another thing I found was... every time I reported a bug with it, the devs would just come back and say &quot;Not enough information. Give us more. Including debug symbol tracings.&quot; Without telling me what debug symbols were, or where to get them...

Anyway, good luck with it. I suggest that you tweak the icons on the left hand side to be smaller (No text, just icons)... I think its under the View menu... I found that that saved screen space...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh&#8230; Not really a hack or feature. But I just un-installed Evolution from my box&#8230; I&#8217;ve found it to be useless in the long run. </p>
<p>Its just too buggy! The number of crashes, problems, corruptions, deaths, panics and general horriblenesses its caused made me give up. I&#8217;ve just switched back to Thunderbird. <img src='http://www.sehofstede.nl/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Another thing I found was&#8230; every time I reported a bug with it, the devs would just come back and say &#8220;Not enough information. Give us more. Including debug symbol tracings.&#8221; Without telling me what debug symbols were, or where to get them&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, good luck with it. I suggest that you tweak the icons on the left hand side to be smaller (No text, just icons)&#8230; I think its under the View menu&#8230; I found that that saved screen space&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.sehofstede.nl/switch-to-evolution/comment-page-1#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.qense.nl/?p=113#comment-220</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t use Evolution anymore. Not because it&#039;s bad (since it&#039;s not, and in some ways superior to Kontact that I&#039;m using now), but because 

1. I wanted something more integrated with KDE (not applicable to you, and it can be made to be decently KDE-friendly if you take the time)
2. More importantly. it felt so slow. Granted, that was a few versions ago (whatever version it was that was included with Feisty) so it may have improved. And no, that wasn&#039;t because I ran it under KDE. It felt just as slow in its &quot;native&quot; Gnome environment. 

I&#039;m not sure why it felt so slow but I suspect it was because my mail archive was so big (let me put it this way...it was originally mails delivered into my Outlook Express client when I used Windows 95, converted to a standard Outlook .pst mailbox of approximately 1.5 gig in size when I converted to Win2000 and Outlook and then converted to Thunderbird, and finally into Evolution/Unix format when I switched to Linux full-time and I haven&#039;t really gotten around to prune away the crud - what can I say, I&#039;m a packrat).

What I&#039;m getting at: does it steel feel kinda slow? Especially since you too apparently keep a lot of mails around for extended periods of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use Evolution anymore. Not because it&#8217;s bad (since it&#8217;s not, and in some ways superior to Kontact that I&#8217;m using now), but because </p>
<p>1. I wanted something more integrated with KDE (not applicable to you, and it can be made to be decently KDE-friendly if you take the time)<br />
2. More importantly. it felt so slow. Granted, that was a few versions ago (whatever version it was that was included with Feisty) so it may have improved. And no, that wasn&#8217;t because I ran it under KDE. It felt just as slow in its &#8220;native&#8221; Gnome environment. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why it felt so slow but I suspect it was because my mail archive was so big (let me put it this way&#8230;it was originally mails delivered into my Outlook Express client when I used Windows 95, converted to a standard Outlook .pst mailbox of approximately 1.5 gig in size when I converted to Win2000 and Outlook and then converted to Thunderbird, and finally into Evolution/Unix format when I switched to Linux full-time and I haven&#8217;t really gotten around to prune away the crud &#8211; what can I say, I&#8217;m a packrat).</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m getting at: does it steel feel kinda slow? Especially since you too apparently keep a lot of mails around for extended periods of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

